5 Cars With The Most Useless (But Cool) Factory Features Ever

Share
BMW

Cars have done a lot of evolving over the decades, going from an engine and four (or three) wheels to sophisticated, high-tech devices. Automakers are constantly looking for the next performance or comfort upgrade to give their products a competitive edge in the market.

Sometimes companies introduce features that eventually become commonplace, like the speedometer or the climate control system. Other times, the ideas miss the mark. In this list, we take a closer look at five automotive features that have shown up in cars over the course of auto history, but did not catch on.

However, these innovations were much cooler on paper than they turned out to be in real life. From sci-fi-esque infotainment controls to moving headlights, here are some of the most bizarre and useless automotive features in history.

Swiveling Third Headlight

Tucker 48

1948_tucker_48_full_frontal
Bring A Trailer

Modern cars are equipped with all sorts of features to improve visibility and make night driving safer. Headlight design has improved considerably over the decades. For example, LED technology, which was first used in daytime running lights just over two decades ago in the Audi R8, has now become commonplace. Automatic systems that switch between high beams and low beams to avoid dazzling other drivers have also become ubiquitous.

In the late 1940s, however, things were very different. Modern automotive technology was still a long way away, but Preston Tucker, a controversial automotive entrepreneur, wanted to bring the future a little closer. He designed an innovative model called the Tucker 48 (sometimes referred to as the Tucker Torpedo). This car had a feature on board which had been invented a few decades earlier, but never made it to the mainstream car market: a third headlight, located right in the middle of the machine's front end.

This headlight was not just fixed in place for additional visibility. The lamp swiveled as the driver turned the steering wheel to shine additional light in the car’s path. There was also a legal hurdle to overcome when the Tucker 48 was introduced to the public, because cars with more than two headlights were illegal in 17 states. Tucker was forced to come up with a headlight cover for customers in those areas. The 48 never made it to mass production, making the whole exercise somewhat pointless.

G-Force Meter

BMW i4, Subaru BRZ, And Several Other Models

2025 BMW i4 M50 instrument display
Joel Stocksdale

Today’s sports cars, or even models that have just a sprinkle of sporty character, are frequently equipped with features aimed at the driver who wants to enjoy the occasional track day. From dedicated driving modes to lap-time counters, there is no shortage of gizmos out there for people who want to feel like a racing driver for a moment. In some cases, however, the features in question are simply not that useful.

One gadget that most of us could do without is a G-force meter, especially if it’s taking up space on the instrument cluster that could be used for something else. While the idea of measuring G-forces sounds cool on paper, it’s unlikely ever to be actually useful. Even with the most enthusiastic driver behind the wheel, taking a corner in an ordinary sports car is unlikely to induce G-LOC (loss of consciousness due to high Gs). It's probably best to leave this gauge to the professional racing drivers and fighter pilots.

Gesture Control

BMW 7 Series

BMW Gesture control
BMW

Next, we have a feature that looks like something out of a sci-fi movie, but doesn’t actually make the driving experience much easier or smoother. Gesture Control is a way to operate an infotainment system, which involves using gestures (such as a flick of the wrist or a swiping motion) rather than touching physical screens or buttons.

This feature is most notably associated with BMW. After a period of testing, which included using the technology on automotive production lines, the German automaker implemented Gesture Control on the 7 Series in 2017. The tech was later available on other models, such as the iX.

However, Gesture Control did not quite pan out the way BMW had hoped. It was less intuitive than the company had originally envisioned, had a high potential for accidentally registering input, and, most importantly, required the driver to take their hands off the steering wheel repeatedly.

In a world where voice assistants are getting more and more sophisticated, and automakers are sometimes even pivoting back towards old-fashioned buttons and knobs, the Gesture Control feature simply did not catch on with the public. It may have looked cool, but this implementation had too many flaws to be viable.

Sources: Mercedes-Benz, Cadillac, BMW, Subaru

Read the full article on CarBuzz

This article originally appeared on CarBuzz and is republished here with permission.  

Share
Autos